Category: Views

  • Language Models – Based Tools Will Radically Change Education

    Language Models – Based Tools Will Radically Change Education

    IBL News | New York

    Microsoft supported ChatGPT, which uses a neural network to generate responses from data sources from the Internet and the AI-generated art tool DALL-E had many educators wondering about the future of learning.

    The dominant conviction is that with AI for the masses, education is about to radically change, as an article in Getting Smart publication states.

    Essentially, this technology allows educators to design efficient and personalized learning systems while students learn with more tailored and effective instruction based on their individual needs.

    From existing underlying data, AI/ML (Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning) machines take huge amounts of data and predict relevant responses and they can build on previous responses as they learn from their interactions with the user.

    The result is a more natural and helpful conversation, which is vastly different from the existing chatbots used currently online on many help desks.

    The potential of this technology will result in highly personalized, adaptive learning programs for the masses with 1:1 tutoring support provided by sophisticated AI tutors and coaches; improved assessment and rubrics with continued questions; social-emotional and mental health virtual counselors; better teaching and decision-making methods; lesson plans and learning modules automatically created with entering texts, videos, and media sources — as the new Nolej and Edthena platforms, built on ChatGPT, are showing.

  • ChatGPT-4, the Fined Tuned Version of ChatGPT-3, Might Prompt a Major Shift

    ChatGPT-4, the Fined Tuned Version of ChatGPT-3, Might Prompt a Major Shift

    IBL News | New York

    The expectation is mounting up around OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4, which is scheduled for 2023, although there is no official confirmation on either the launch or beta testing of it.

    GPT-4 stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4. It’s basically an artificial intelligence system that can create human-like text.

    While the current ChatGPT-3 has 175 billion parameters, ChatGPT-4 might have 1 trillion, or even more, according to some reports. Similarly, it will be capable of text answering, content generation, language translation, and text summarization, just like the current ChatGPT-3.

    The increase of parameters — a measure of the complexity of the neural machine to do useful things — should enable ChatGPT-4 to produce more accurate responses at a much faster rate. This AI-powered technology might prompt a major shift in the economy, some experts claim.

    It’s been 29 months since OpenAI launched GPT-2, its large-language model, which demonstrated the power of transformers-based neural networks. GPT-2 impressed experts with the quality of its natural text generation. Its successor GPT-3, released in 2020, was a bigger, more complex model, that delivered even more powerful results, not only with texts but with audio, images, and movies.

    In 1998, Yann LeCun’s breakthrough neural network, LeNet, sported 60,000 parameters.

    Twenty years later, OpenAI’s first version of GPT had 110 million parameters. GPT-2 has 1.75 billion, and GPT-3, now two years old, has 175 billion.

    Another consequence of GPT-4 would be on the price front. The cost of generated text has been declining rapidly. Today, it’s half a cent for about 700 words of output.

    Another angle of the rapid advance of this new wave of chatbots is the impact on Google’s search business. The New York Times signaled that the release of ChatGPT led Google’s management to declare a “code red.”

    The Times said that existing ChatGPT made its case to be the industry’s next big disrupter as it can serve up information in clear, simple sentences rather than just a list of Internet links.

    “It can explain concepts in ways people can easily understand. It can even generate ideas from scratch, including business strategies, Christmas gift suggestions, blog topics, and vacation plans.”

    See the examples below of ChatGPT and Google’s full of ads answers:

    ChatGPT was released by an aggressive research lab called OpenAI, and Google is among the many other companies, labs, and researchers that have helped build this technology.

    But experts believe the tech giant could struggle to compete with the newer, smaller companies developing these chatbots, because of the many ways the technology could damage its business.

    In addition, this type of replacement for online search might not be suited to deliver digital search ads, which accounted for more than 80% of Google’s revenue last year.

    Even if Google has the same technology, if a chatbot responds to queries with tight sentences, there is less reason for people to click on advertising links.

    As Amr Awadallah, who worked for Yahoo and Google and now runs Vectara, a start-up that is building similar technology, said, “If Google gives you the perfect answer to each query, you won’t click on any ads.”

    Employees at Google have also been tasked with building AI products, including those that can create artwork and other images, like OpenAI’s DALL-E technology, used by more than three million people.

     

    .

  • The Release of OpenAI Keeps Educators and Professionals Processing the Implications

    The Release of OpenAI Keeps Educators and Professionals Processing the Implications

    IBL News | New York

    The recent release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, a fine-tuned version of a general-purpose chatbot is generating concern among experts worried about the reach of this technology after it took the Internet by storm.

    Paul Kedrosky, a renowned economist, venture capitalist, and MIT fellow, wrote, “shame on OpenAI for launching this pocket nuclear bomb without restrictions into an unprepared society.” He added, “OpenAI most disruptive change the U.S. economy has seen in 100 years, and not in a good way.”

    Experts are noting the massive consequences of essay writing, software engineering, and legal documents. Educators from top universities have said they won’t know what essays are fake.

    Moreover, they wonder how they’ll be able to distinguish original writing from the algorithmically generated essays they are bound to receive — and that can evade anti-plagiarism software.

    ChatGPT learning technology is learning from the request, while disruptive robots in a manufacturing plant only create economic consequences for the people working there but do not move across sector by sector.

    The fact that OpenAI is so capable of answering questions like a person is keeping professionals across a range of industries trying to process the implications.

    Analysts are highlighting the words of Elon Musk — who left OpenAI over disagreements about the company development —  when he said in 2019 that AI was an existential threat. Musk has repeatedly called for all organizations developing AI to be regulated, including his own Tesla.

    Meanwhile, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has talked about the dangers of not thinking about “societal consequences” when “you’re building something on an exponential curve.”

    Another angle of the consequences of ChatGPT is the ongoing lawsuit that is mounting against Microsoft and OpenAI over copyright infringement in the context of in-training machine learning algorithms.

    The successor to GPT-3, most likely called GPT-4, is expected to be unveiled in the near future, perhaps in 2023.

    Techcrunch: Is ChatGPT a ‘virus that has been released into the wild’?

  • The OLC Conference Awarded Twelve Educators for Innovation in Online Learning

    The OLC Conference Awarded Twelve Educators for Innovation in Online Learning

    IBL News | Orlando, Florida

    The OLC (Online Learning Consortium) awarded twelve instructors for their contributions and leadership in distance education during its annual conference, which took place in a Walt Disney resort in Orlando, Florida, this week.

    The event gathered around 1,100 attendants, most of them practitioners in online learning. The 2022 OLC Excellence Award Winners received their recognition for reflecting “leadership, change-making, and the advancement of exemplary practices in online, blended, and digital learning,” according to the organization.

    These are the awards recipients:

    • Excellence in Faculty Development:
    Reed Dickson, Pima Community College

    • Excellence in Instructional and Teaching Practice:
    Rene Corbeil and Maria Elena Corbeil, from the University of Texas Rio Grande
    Mark Gale, Letitia Bergantz, and Joy Oettel, from Athen State University

    Gomary-Mayadas Award for Excellence in Online Educational Leadership:
    Matthew Pittman, from Ivy Tech Community College

    John R. Bourne Award for Excellence in Online Programs and Programming:
    Mara Huber and Christina Heath, from University at Buffalo

    In addition, the OLC organization honored the 2022 Class of Fellows Awards. “They show an outstanding qualification, experience, contributions, and leadership in online learning,” said Mary Niemiec, Member Board Of Directors. “These experts are leading the way in online learning,” added Jenniffer Mathes, CEO at OLC.

    Terry Anderson, Professor Emeritus at Athabasca University
    Luke Dowden, Chief Online Learning Officer at Alamo Colleges District
    Kate Jordahl, Professor at Foothill College

    The conference, highly praised by the attendants, featured the expert in digital engagement, Dr. Josie Ahlquist as the keynote speaker.

    She encouraged educators to “engage authentically” and “foster belonging” when building “interactive and impactful communities”. “Digital community leaders are critical hope builders,” she stated. “Isolation is an enemy of hope; community is an ally of hope.” 

  • Most Higher Ed CIOs Are Ready to Invest More in Analytics, Says Gartner

    Most Higher Ed CIOs Are Ready to Invest More in Analytics, Says Gartner

    IBL News | Denver, Colorado

    Experts agree that data and analytics are critical for running today’s educational institutions. In fact, 60% of CIOs in higher education say that they are essential, according to Gartner.

    But these implementations are not taking place. There are several inhibitors, according to Marlena Brown, a Senior Research Analyst at Garner Inc.: Ineffective technology, misalignment of needs, and lack of understanding and trust.

    In an opening talk on the main stage during the 2022 Educause in Denver, Colorado, last Thursday, Marlena Brown [in the pictures above and below], revealed that 42% of higher ed CIOs indicated that they want to increase investment in business intelligence and data analytics, while 16% would grow their expenditure in AI/ML (Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning).

    In order to put analytics capabilities to work, Garner Associated examined cases ranging from simple descriptive and diagnostic analysis through predictive and prescriptive analyses that enable institutions to identify and bend trend curves.

    Analytics, with the help of AI and Machine Learning, will determine scenarios impacting student success, as several experts indicated to IBL News during the Educause event. Prescriptive analytics will help to increase the retention of students at risk and avoid the high number of dropping learners.

    According to Gartner, these are the four needed stages of analytics:

    • Descriptive — What happened?
    • Diagnostic — Why did it happen?
    • Predictive — What will happen?
    • Prescriptive — What should I do?

    Technologies involved include regression analytics, forecasting, simulation, predictive models, complex event processing, neural networks, recommendation engines, data hub, and data lake, and analytic sandbox.

    Marlena Brown highlighted the importance of establishing a clear vision, outlining what every institution is trying to achieve. “I’d suggest creating an environment for exploration of advanced analytics as well,” she added.

     

  • “We Need More From Technology,” Says Educause While Presenting the 2022 Top 10 Issues

    “We Need More From Technology,” Says Educause While Presenting the 2022 Top 10 Issues

    IBL News | Denver, Colorado

    The higher ed professional association Educause presented the 2023 Top 10 IT issues during its annual conference yesterday in Denver, Colorado.

    “Today’s times demand more from technology,” said Susan Grajek, Vice President for Partnership, Communities, and Research at Educause, during the opening keynote address [In the picture above]. “We need new foundation models,” she added.

    Susan Grajek highlighted the idea that “data leads to better decisions.” “The AI (Artificial Intelligence) foundational models can be applied to higher” as “potential value of AI is emerging.”

    Another idea that Educause insisted on in front of thousands of educators and industry leaders gathered for three days (October 25 – 28, 2022) in Denver was the extension of stress and anxiety among students.

    In an exclusive interview with IBL News, John O’Brien, president of Educause, said that 70% of them show or have shown mental health issues in the last post-pandemic months.

    The top 10 IT issues research was divided into three themes: leading with wisdom, ultra-intelligent institutions, and everything is anywhere.

    1. Leadership – Leading with WisdomIssue #1 – A Seat at the Table: ensuring IT leadership is a full partner in institutional strategic planningIssue #3 – Evolve, Adapt, or Lose Talent: creating a workplace that allows for and supports movement up, down, and sideways to accommodate shifts in personal and professional goals and to foster healthier work/life balanceIssue #5 – Enriching the Leadership Playbook: leading with humility and candor to engage, empower, and retain the IT workforce
    2. Data – The Ultra-Intelligent InstitutionIssue #2 – Privacy and Security 101: embedding privacy and security education and awareness in the curriculum and workplaceIssue #4 – Smooth Sailing for the Student Experience: using technology, data, insight, and agility to create a frictionless student experienceIssue #6 – Expanding Enrollments and the Bottom Line: focusing on data and analytics initiatives on identifying academic programs with high potential for recruitment ROI

      Issue #7 – Moving from Data Insight to Data Action: converting data analytics into action plans to power institutional performance, enhance operational efficiency, and improve student success

    3. Work and Learning – Everything is AnywhereIssue #8 – A New Era of IT Support: updating IT services to support remote and hybrid workIssue #9 – Online, In Person, or Hybrid? Yes: developing a learning-first, technology-enabled strategyIssue #10 – SaaS, ERP, and CRM: an alphabet soup of opportunity: managing cost, risk, and value of investments in new ERP solutions

  • Pandemic-Disrupted Teaching and Learning Effects Will Continue for Decades, Stanford Says

    Pandemic-Disrupted Teaching and Learning Effects Will Continue for Decades, Stanford Says

    IBL News | New York

    Reverberations of pandemic-disrupted teaching and learning will likely continue for decades. The seismic changes of the health outbreak in 2020 and 2021 will result in a no return to “normal”.

    This is the main conclusion of a report elaborated by Stanford University Digital Education unit, released this month. This Pandemic Education Report — as it has been titled — gathered stories about how the campus supported academic continuity during the period of emergency remote instruction. Stanford leaders, faculty, staff, and students provided diverse perspectives on the challenges they faced.

    This extensive review will serve as the foundation on which Stanford can design its future digital education strategy, said the institution. “The disruption to teaching and learning, as devastating as it was, also contains gems of opportunity,” stated the authors of the report, as shown in the video below.

    The 87-page report, comprised of interviews with 59 administrators and faculty, as well as a survey of 6,000 students, follows similar reviews elaborated by Harvard University, MIT, and other institutions.

    Regarding the extensive use of Zoom and Canvas, the report points out ideas such as:

    • “The suddenly more prominent role of Zoom and Canvas when emergency remote education began did raise concerns among some faculty and staff. It meant that Stanford’s teaching, learning, and work were conducted in platforms developed by private, for-profit companies whose products were designed to accommodate a wide range of customer needs. Zoom, in particular, is a business meeting tool not designed with education in mind.”
    • “Instructors quickly increased their skill in using Zoom for teaching and thoughtfully reworked their instruction, with help from newly developed resources and training programs rapidly spun up by teams across campus. These innovations, explored in this review, improved student engagement in remote teaching and learning.”
    • “What’s more, because of Stanford’s location in Silicon Valley, it had a strong connection with the company based in nearby San Jose before the pandemic began.” (…) “We already had this highly scalable infrastructure with Zoom and, furthermore, a very tight relationship with their CEO and founder.”
      .

     

     

  • AI Language Model GPT-3 Arrives into Higher Education

    AI Language Model GPT-3 Arrives into Higher Education

    IBL News | New York

    The arrival of the web-based software GPT-3 as an API service for developers has started to impact the higher education landscape. One of the first applications is writing papers on the cheap. The Chronicle of Higher Ed wonders if this type of artificial intelligence program will kill college writing.

    “These outputs can be astonishingly specific and tailored. When asked to write a song protesting the inhumane treatment of animals in the style of Bob Dylan, the program clearly draws on themes from Dylan’s,” says The Chronicle.

    The GPT-3 software, developed by an Elon Musk-backed, San Francisco-based nonprofit called OpenAI and introduced in 2020, is a kind of omniscient, smart Siri or Alexa that can turn any prompt into prose or even can write code. There are multiple examples of experiments on YouTube with demos of AI robots interacting with humans. [Example I] [Example II] [Example III].

    This technology performs a wide variety of natural language tasks, translating natural language to code. Many companies are currently building products on top of OpenAI’s flagship large language model (LLM).

    In addition to banks using Davinci, the largest GPT-3 model, for its customer service chatbot, this usage of deep learning technology to produce humanlike text, video, and advice is expected to be increasingly implemented in assessments of student learning. The role of faculty, students, research, and publications will be rethought with GPT-3 by the advent of this level of human-computer interaction, according to analyst and writer Ray Schroeder.

    Beyond facts and perspectives, neural networks learn and teach skills, including mathematics, computer programming, creative writing (without plagiarizing responses), and even poetry — after they have absorbed and processed terabytes of text and literature online. GPT-3 has been trained on most of what has been publicly written, including Wikipedia, books, scientific papers, and news articles.

    The success of GPT-3 has encouraged other companies to launch their own LLM research projects. Google, Meta, Nvidia, and other large tech corporations have accelerated work on LLMs.

    Today, there are several LLMs that match or outpace GPT-3 in size or benchmark performance, including Meta’s OPT-175B, DeepMind’s Chinchilla, Google’s PaLM, and Nvidia’s Megatron MT-NLG.

    This month, Amazon’s AI researchers unveiled Alexa Teacher Models (AlexaTM 20B), claiming that it beats GPT-3 on NLP benchmarks. The model is yet to be released publicly. [GitHub repository].

    GPT-3 also triggered the launch of several open-source projects that aimed to bring LLMs available to a wider audience. BigScience’s BLOOM and EleutherAI’s GPT-J are two examples of open-source LLMs available free of charge. Also, Cerebras has created a huge AI processor that can train and run LLMs with billions of parameters at a fraction of the cost.

    However, OpenAI — which has recently slashed the price of its GPT-3 API service by up to two-thirds this month —  is no longer the only company that is providing LLM API services. Hugging Face, Cohere, and Humanloop are some of the other players on the field.

    Hugging Face provides a large variety of different transformers, all of which are available as downloadable open-source models or through API calls. Hugging Face recently released a new LLM service powered by Microsoft Azure, which OpenAI also uses for its GPT-3 API.

    Many organizations can’t handle the technical challenges of training and running the models, as LLM requires dozens or even hundreds of GPUs — huge hardware costs. That’s one of the reasons that OpenAI and other companies decided to provide API access to LLMs.

    Interaction opportunities with AI: Copy.AI, Blenderbot.AI, Iamsophie.IO

    Ray Schoeder: Higher Ed, Meet GPT-3: We Will Never Be the Same!

  • Zovio Sells Fullstack Academy and Liquidates the Company

    Zovio Sells Fullstack Academy and Liquidates the Company

    IBL News | New York

    The for-profit edtech firm Zovio Inc. (Nasdaq: ZVO) will approve the liquidation and dissolution of the company at a virtual shareholder meeting next October 25, 2022, as reflected in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board of Directors closed the business on September 11, 2022.

    Following the liquidation, Zovio plans to sell Fullstack Academy for an amount estimated between $34 and $55 million, according to the mentioned filing to the SEC. Stockholders would receive only a portion of it, probably below $20 million.

    With a team of 1,400 employees, mostly residing in Arizona, California, and Colorado, Zovio was a troubled education technology company servicing higher education institutions.

    In August, Zovio sold its online program management (OPM) business to the University of Arizona Global Campus (UAGC). Two years before, the University of Arizona purchased another company asset, Ashford University, which became the Global Campus.

    The Global Campus also took over a Zovio office in Chandler, Arizona, with $20 million remaining on its lease.

    In May 2022, Chandler, Arizona-based Zovio, sold TutorMe, for $55 million.

    Now, under its Plan of Dissolution, Zovio will sell Fullstack Academy, an initiative that offers coding, data analytics, and software development classes online and at their New York City campus.

     

  • Adobe’s Stock Continues to Fall as the Market Signals Its Concern About the Figma Deal

    Adobe’s Stock Continues to Fall as the Market Signals Its Concern About the Figma Deal

    IBL News | New York

    After Figma’s purchase by Adobe for $20 billion, analysts wonder which design startups will be the acquisition targets, especially those in the creative space. Specifically, it will be interesting to see what comes next for companies like Canva and Sketch.

    Meanwhile, Adobe’s stock continued to fall by another 1.16% yesterday, losing the bull day in the market. Wall Street signaled its concern with the Figma deal, saying that this wasn’t the acquisition to do.

    Wells Fargo analyst Michael Turrin cut his rating on the Adobe stock along with his price target. Edward Jones, Oppenheimer, Baird, Bank of America, and Barclays downgraded the stock in response. Most of them talked about the price being an issue.

    Since the purchase yesterday the stock has dropped 22.68%, reflecting the negative view of investors. Significantly, the capitalization loss amounts to $25 billion, more than the purchasing price.

    The transaction, announced last week, was surprising for its scale and valuation — twice over a year ago, when Figma was last valued at $10 billion in June 2021.

    Until it, Adobe’s largest deal was Marketo’s acquisition for $4.7 billion in 2018. Experts estimate that Adobe paid an astronomical amount simply because Figma was a threat to Adobe.

    Adobe XD is a similar product, but its pricing structure of $600 per year, as part of the package of Creative Cloud All Apps, makes it unattractive, especially in the educational industry.

    “Adobe saw the Figma deal as its organization-altering moment as it watched the creative market making a key change from one centered on creating assets with tools like Photoshop and Illustrator to one firmly focused on the creators themselves and the collaborative nature of the design process,” concluded analyst Ron Miller on Techcrunch.

    The visionary founders of Figma, backed by large amounts of capital ($333 million to date) shed by the Silicon Valley top firms, were becoming an increasing business problem for the old-guard company of Adobe.

    The willingness of Adobe to overspend to grab the young upstart and fast-scaling business has been seen as a defensive move.