Category: Views

  • Amazon’s Gigantic Training Effort Shows How Automation Is Transforming the Job Market

    Amazon’s Gigantic Training Effort Shows How Automation Is Transforming the Job Market

    Mikel Amigot | IBL News

    Amazon –with almost 300,000 employees in the U.S. and over 630,000 worldwide– is the latest example of a large employer committing to retrain workers. It will invest $700 million over six years to upskill 100,000 of its employees across the U.S.

    Other companies that have concluded that they must coach existing staff to take on different types of work are WalmartAT&T, JPMorgan Chase, and Accenture.

    New automation and AI technologies are transforming the workplace and companies are struggling to recruit talent.

    There is a revealing statistic from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS): there are now more job openings (7.4 million) than there are unemployed Americans (6 million).

    No doubt, this is one of the hottest job markets in decades.

    And in looking at job growth over the next decade, the Bureau of Labor Statistics anticipates that some of the fastest-growing jobs will increasingly be in more skilled areas. This includes medical assistants, statisticians, software developers, nurse practitioners, and wind turbine service technicians.

    Investing in their own workforces seems to be a smart approach for corporations.

    One caveat. Experts say that retraining programs boost employee morale and keep workers from leaving a company, but they are not for everybody. Not everyone has the capacity or will to prepare themselves for a new role.

    According to the Association for Talent Development (ATD), large employers with 10,000+ workers spent an average of $500 per worker on training in 2017.

    Amazon’s massive corporate retraining initiative worth $700 million breaks down into $7,000 per employee or $1,200 a year through 2025 in the U.S.

  • Creating Compelling Slides: Bullet Point the Content or Read Scripts?

    Creating Compelling Slides: Bullet Point the Content or Read Scripts?

    Marie I. Rose | IBL News

    One of the most time-consuming tasks in instructional design is creating slides.

    Slides are the backbone of any course. We usually outline the talking points, script the visuals and convey important information for the students.

    Many times slides are accompanied by texts to be teleprompted by lecturers. This mostly depends on their personality and teaching style.

    The dilemma is whether to bullet point the content or read scripts.

    However, one requirement is certain: we need to create killer visuals. Layouts, texts, pictures, icons, videos, graphics, animations, colors, and fonts need to be compelling. And flipping through slides (Keynote or PowerPoint) should result in an engaging teaching experience.

    Let us share some of our recommendations when designing slides:

    • Choose wide-screen format 16:9.
    • Use bullets or very short sentences. Do not add paragraphs of information on your slides: learners become distracted and stop listening. Use multiple slides for a topic if the content is too long.
    • Pick sans serif fonts: they are easier to read and seem more friendly. Some of the classics are Arial, Geneva, Lucida Grande, Tahoma, Trebuchet MS, and Verdana.At IBL our favorites are Roboto, Open Sans, Lato, Fira Sans, Libre Franklin, and Karla… Never Helvetica!

      Regarding size, use fonts larger than 22 points.

      The Fontsquirrel.com website includes many free fonts.
    • Choose 2-3 colors to that work well together. Use the color palette combinations or pick your brand’s color if the course is an extension of your activities. Adobe has a good color picker. Coolors.co is another good generator.
  • CanvasLMS’ CEO on the Learning Data Controversy: “Information Will Be Owned by Institutions”

    CanvasLMS’ CEO on the Learning Data Controversy: “Information Will Be Owned by Institutions”

    Mikel Amigot | IBL News (Long Beach, CA)

    Instructure’s CEO Dan Goldsmith said that learning data accumulated on its Canvas platform, with 30 million learners, “is owned by the student and institutions, and it should always stay that way”.

    Mr. Goldsmith made this claim at a conversation with a selected group of journalists and analysts (IBL News, among them) yesterday in Long Beach, CA, during the Canvas LMS annual conference.

    The controversy around the usage of data started when Instructure disclosed the existence of DIG, a data analytics, predictive and AI-based internally developed project. “There is a lot of potential to use data and information to benefit education. It is important to open this conversation”.

    Instructure, however, doesn’t have a launch date. “We don’t want to make mistakes with DIG, and we don’t want to be constrained with a timeline,” he added.

    On the adaptive and personalized topic, Dan Goldsmith claimed that “it is inevitable as an educational community to figure out ways to use personalized learning.”

    Asked about its strategy now that Canvas LMS is recognized in the industry as the market leader in North America, he said: “Our benchmark is the 1.5 billion students there are in the world”. “If we are constantly looking at our competitors we will lose many opportunities for innovation”.

    Regarding competitors, “I have a good conversation with them. I talk to CEOs, and have a good relation. At the end of the day, we have a common mission.”

    Based in Salt Lake City, Utah, and with a staff of 1,200 employees, this publicly traded company is not profitable yet, although “we are a financially stable organization”. “We are in a good position to make an impact”.

    Regarding its software developments, Mr. Goldsmith highlighted that “there are 250 applications built on top on Canvas by our customers”. “We are not the only channel for innovation”.

    He also stressed that “we will continue to maintain our commitment toward open source. We have a very thriving community that we support”.

    See the video below exclusively shot by IBL News.

     

     

  • It’s All About Increasing Learners’ Engagement in Courses and Programs

    It’s All About Increasing Learners’ Engagement in Courses and Programs

    Mikel Amigot | IBL News

    A measure to calibrate the success of a learning platform and an ongoing program is the progress of engagement. If engagement improves, then revenues go up and administrators, instructors, and students smile.

    edX, for example, has seen an 11 % increase in their engagement rate in the last two years. Now it claims a 42 % engagement rate.

    The question is what truly generates engagement in courses.  Three are three main factors, in our view:

    • Content quality along with the design of the course
    • Platform’s pedagogical technology and new features
    • Content marketing and SEO campaigns to allow learners to find their desired courses

    Please examine the graphic above, captured from Studio, the authoring tool of the Open edX platform –which is open-source and free to install.

    The third checkmark refers to a core technical and pedagogical characteristic of this platform: active learning.

    The course content is presented through learning sequences: a set of interwoven videos, readings, discussions, wikis, collaborative and social media tools, exercises and materials with automatic assessments and instant feedback.

    Students alternate between learning concepts and solving simple exercises to check their understanding.

    As a best practice, edX recommends building diverse learning sequences, following researchers’ discoveries. “We recommend that 80% or more of your learning sequences or subsection include multiple content types (such as video, discussion, or problem)”.

    Gently nudging students, tutoring them and setting and soft deadlines in the course is equally helpful.

    Would you suggest additional engagement techniques?

     

     

     

  • Asimov Predicted the State of Education in 2019. Was He Right?

    Asimov Predicted the State of Education in 2019. Was He Right?

    Mikel Amigot | IBL News

    “AI, Machine Learning, Augmented and Virtual Reality, Adaptive Learning, Big Data, and so on, and so.”

    This is how Jeffrey Riman, Professor at FIT and Chair of the Faculty Advisory Council on Teaching and Technology (FACT2) at SUNY, summarized the technology issues dominating the conversation in higher ed during the 2019 CIT Conference.

    “Among the many challenges for faculty and instructional support staff are increased complexity and steeper learning curves, greater time commitment, and outsourced content creation and assessment strategies. Course size will continue to grow, and the pace of change is accelerating,” said Jeffrey Riman [in the picture].

    “And one thing we know: history is not a predictor of future performance,” he added.

    Funny reference to history. Let’s go back four decades.

    On December 31, 1983, esteemed scholar and best-selling sci-fi writer Isaac Asimov predicted how the world would be in 2019.

    He wrote: “Education, which must be revolutionized in the new world, will be revolutionized by the very agency that requires the revolution – the computer…”

    “There will be an opportunity finally for every youngster, and indeed, every person, to learn, in his or her own time, at his or own speed, in his or her own way…”

    “Education will become fun because it will bubble up from within and not be forced in from without.”

    Does anyone dare to predict how education will be in 2065?

    Asimov the genius did envision the impact of the computer and the connected network, as well as the potential of on-demand learning at scale.

    For a fully universal, personalized, adapted and fun education, we might need to wait a little longer.

    But foundations are building up.

  • Ideas to Boost Your Course Completion Rate

    Ideas to Boost Your Course Completion Rate

    Mikel Amigot | IBL News

    Completion rates of free massive online courses have traditionally been low, at an average of 5%. This is mostly because these online classes are not offering an appealing benefit in career advancement and do not include tutoring to follow up with learners.

    In addition, requiring students to make an upfront payment, often with a minimal fee, show their commitment to the class. It is like in brick-and-mortar colleges: those who pay their own tuition are more likely to continue.

    As an instructional designer, a good technique to increase engagement is to place a survey at the beginning of the course asking students how they will apply their new knowledge and what their expectations are.

    It is also very helpful to feature the materials available for certain course intervals and include synchronous sessions and live office hours. Whatsapp, Slack, Twitter, Facebook or even Google Hangouts are efficient tools for a face-to-face conference.

    This can be combined with group projects and peer assessments ––Open edX includes those two functionalities.

    Naturally, discussion forums and problem submissions must be managed. Having at least one teaching assistant who interacts with students via forums, Piazza-style boards or email will end up motivating learners.

    Chatbot agents and AI-Teaching AssistantsGeorgia Tech-style, which are able to personalize experiences are also an option.

    Economic incentives, such as AWS’ or IBM’s cloud free-credit for young entrepreneurs, are smart approaches.

    Imposing deadlines for course completion tends to work well but it could also discourage enrollment. A solution can be to keep parts of the course open without registration. (This possibility –available on Open edX, too– is beneficial for SEO purposes, since Google and other search crawlers can index your public courses.)

    Finally, consider adaptive learning. AI-driven adaptive or personalized courses are becoming a reality. Behavioral Sciences and predictive analytics help learners succeed. New learning ecosystems are being designed with this requirement.

     

  • View: Are the Golden Years of Education Entrepreneurship Gone?

    View: Are the Golden Years of Education Entrepreneurship Gone?

    Mikel Amigot | IBL News

    The push to launch start-ups is certainly over. In 2013, nearly 768 education companies were founded. Today that number has dropped below 125.

    Within 18 months, from late 2011, we saw the launch of MOOC platforms Coursera, edX, Udacity and FutureLearn. In addition, in 2012, three more lifelong learning organizations were founded: Degreed, Minerva and Flatiron School.

    After many tweaks, those companies finally found successful revenue models.

    Looking today, something strange is happening. Creativity and entrepreneurial spirit haven’t decreased. But monetization is tougher, and investors do not have the patience they showed a decade ago.

    Colleges and universities have mostly behaved as anti-innovation engines, mainly because of traditionalists within the faculty and administrators’ exclusive concern with revenue generation. Large corporations have concentrated on their core businesses, paying little attention to new forms of training and education. Non-profits and philanthropist-driven organizations have played it safe, too, promoting partnerships with traditional universities.

    There is much to fix and new times will arrive. Higher ed institutions and businesses need to think differently in order to adequately respond to the new demands of lifelong learners.

  • View: A MOOC Platform Catalog is No-Marketing. Leveraging Institutional Networks Is Key

    View: A MOOC Platform Catalog is No-Marketing. Leveraging Institutional Networks Is Key

    Mikel Amigot | IBL News

    An effective marketing plan will drive enrollment, engage with learners and increase word of mouth awareness.

    We start defining our target audience: who are the type of students who would be interested, what is the course about, and why should learners enroll in the course –what new skills and knowledge will they gain, and how will they benefit and help advance their career. In addition, we need to determine what is the key differentiator of the course: is it the institution, the instructor, the topic?

    We all agree on this approach. We also agree that promoting the course description page (or About page) will require an SEO, Twitter / Facebook / LinkedIn social campaign and maybe some paid Adwords.

    But this isn’t enough. A well-crafted plan needs to activate the college’s existing institutional web properties, faculty networks, PR department media capabilities, blog spaces, newsletters, and landing pages. The outreach of the organization, either is a university or a large company, is simply impressive.

    A client of ours forgot or was unable to activate, this little detail, and the enrollment fell short. This department thought that the failure was due to the lack of presence on a catalog of a big MOOC platform like Coursera o edX.

    Institutions tend to believe before joining a consortium that a MOOC platform is a magic bullet for marketing. When they launch their first course or program, they discover that enrollments are surprisingly low. What happens? Well, first, they put too much faith on those platform advertising pitches, and, second, they don’t activate their institutional networks.

    Truth be told, Coursera and edX do advise about the importance of undertaking an integrated marketing approach between the institution and MOOC platform, with the university’s web assets as the most important. In the end, Google is always your best ally. A centralized catalog has a limited impact.

  • A Billionaire Will Cover the Cost of Coursera’s Illinois Data Science Master’s Degree for His Employees

    A Billionaire Will Cover the Cost of Coursera’s Illinois Data Science Master’s Degree for His Employees

    Marie I. Rose | IBL News

    AI-software provider C3.ai, a company owned by billionaire Tom Siebel, has started to offer employees a fully paid tuition for the Master of Computer Science in Data Science (MCS-DS) from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, available on Coursera for $21,000.  

    Those who complete the degree will get three more career incentives: a $25,000 cash bonus, a 15% salary increase, and a stock option equity award.

    “In this new economy where people are talking about digital transformation; for companies to stay at the top of their game they need to have state-of-the-art continuing education programs,” said Siebel, who got a degree in Computer Science –although residentially – at the same university.

    In 2007, Thomas Siebel, 66, pledged $1000 million to support science and engineering at this institution. Currently, CEO at C3.ai, Siebel, with a fortune of $2.9 billion, is a former salesman who became a billionaire after creating and selling Siebel Systems to rival Oracle in 2006 for $5.8 billion. C3.ai is valued at $2.1 billion.

    In addition to this degree, C3.ai employees, 330 in total today, already have free access to other Coursera courses and Specializations in AI, IoT, clouding computing, and advanced computing.

    “This model of stackable learning will become standard as more companies realize the value of providing a variety of flexible learning pathways for employees to acquire critical skills,” stated Leah Belsky, VP of Enterprise at Coursera.

    “We believe that more and more companies will move in this direction in the future. C3.ai is showing real foresight, and they are putting an incredible amount of employee support behind that foresight,” said Rashid Bashir, Dean of The Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois. “New modes of delivering professional education are crucial to both companies like C3.ai and to universities like Illinois.”

    The Coursera-based MCS degree was launched in 2016. Nearly 700 hundred students are enrolled in the program. The acceptance rate is 30%.

    Illinois’ Department of Computer Science is consistently ranked as one of the top computer science programs in the world. In 2018, it was ranked #5 on the U.S. News and World Report list of Best Computer Science Schools.

    Thomas Siebel, in the picture, shows a clear vision: “At C3.ai, we are assembling a team of inquisitive self-learners, motivated and properly trained to solve some of the world’s most challenging technology problems. This program further enables our employees’ success by encouraging them to further develop their computer science and AI expertise at one of the world’s leading universities.”

    Siebel’s educational offering to employees is probably the most generous one within corporate America, beyond  Starbucks‘, which covers a portion of the tuition for those who earn online B.A.’s from Arizona State University, and Walmart‘s incentive of $1,500 cash bonuses to some workers who finish degrees at three subsidized schools.

    He claimed in Forbes that “the money his company will spend on employee degrees and cash bonuses are a drop in the bucket when you consider how much we spend on human capital.” When you add in other benefits and travel, he says each employee already costs the company more than $350,000 a year. “If someone is increasing their skills, advancing their career, setting themselves up for multiple promotions, providing better service for their customers, in that context the amount we’re spending on this benefit is nothing.”

  • An Institution Prepares Students for Jobs which Won’t Be Automatized

    An Institution Prepares Students for Jobs which Won’t Be Automatized

    Mikel Amigot | IBL News (Boston)

    Job automation has already started. Stats indicate that 10% of American jobs will be automated in 2019. An upsetting forecast indicates that up to 73 million U.S. jobs will be automated by 2030.

    But there is hope. First: nearly 2 million new non-routine jobs which machines cannot easily perform are being created every year in the United States. Second: an increasing number of colleges and universities understand the challenge and are starting to prepare students who demand jobs which won’t be automated.

    Foundry College is one of them. Its Founder, Dr. Stephen Kosslyn, addressed the issue yesterday during the Eduventures Summit in Boston with a physician example. “Diagnosis of illness will soon be accomplished well by machines. But sitting with the family to discuss treatment options will be difficult to automate.”

    At least two skills are automation resistant: “Recognizing and responding to emotion when communicating and making decisions. And taking context into account when analyzing situations, creatively solving problems, and prioritizing goals,” Stephen Kosslyn said.

    Foundry College, which is focused on what’s difficult to automate, has listed five key underpinnings:

    • Critical thinking
    • Creative problem solving
    • Clear communication
    • Constructive personal interactions
    • Good judgment

    To pair these essential skills, this institution has reimagined a future-proof, two-year curriculum. On the first year, Foundry teaches:

    • Critical Analyses
    • Practical Problem Solving
    • Clear Communication
    • Learning at Work
    • Working with Others
    • Managing Yourself at Work

    On the second year:

    • Communicating and Conveying in Business
    • Navigating Work
    • Thinking with Software
    • Customer Service and Sales
    • Health Care Management
    • System and Service Management