Spanish firefighters save calf from smoke and flames
Source: Youtube

Spanish firefighters save calf from smoke and flames
Source: Youtube

How Trump’s New Air Force One Poses Potential Security Risks
Source: Youtube

Democrats pick Platner’s replacement in Maine Senate race
Source: Youtube

IBL News | New York
Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta, Palantir, and more than 20 top tech companies released a letter Friday defending open-source AI models while urging policymakers to avoid “premature restrictions” that would “stifle competition or drive innovation overseas.”
The joint letter came as Chinese open-weight models are gaining steam against leading offerings from American companies, sparking a debate about whether they should be restricted.
These models are available for users to download, modify, and run on their own infrastructure, and they have been the subject of fierce debate within the tech sector in recent weeks.
OpenAI and Anthropic, which are gearing up for potentially massive IPOs, did not sign the letter.
Moonshot AI, a Chinese startup, amplified concerns earlier this month after releasing a model called Kimi K3 that outperforms cutting-edge American offerings across some industry benchmarks. However, the U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that the Trump administration would look into whether Chinese companies were stealing American intellectual property, and stated that the government has “the ability to sanction them because of this theft.”
But in the letter on Friday, the group of U.S. tech companies cautioned against any rash actions. They wrote that open-weight models strengthen competition and ensure that the benefits of the technology are “broadly shared rather than concentrated in a few hands.”
“Relying solely on closed models is not inherently safe: they can be breached, misused, or fail in ways that outsiders cannot detect,” the letter said. “And concentrating advanced AI capabilities behind a small number of closed models compounds that risk.”
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella both shared the letter on their personal social media accounts.
Jensen Huang wrote, “AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country. Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty. The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models.”
Satya Nadella said, “Open-weight models are essential to a healthy AI ecosystem. Together with others across our industry, we are outlining a path for open-weight models to strengthen American competitiveness and expand economic opportunity, while protecting national security.”
Elon Musk, who runs an AI business under his rocket company SpaceX, also amplified the letter on social media, writing that it has his “full support” in a post on X.
In the letter on Friday, the U.S. tech companies said that concerns about unlawful distillation should be addressed through “targeted legal and commercial frameworks” instead of with “sweeping restrictions on techniques that play an important role in AI innovation.”
“Our AI leadership will be judged not by one frontier AI model, but by whether the United States builds a strong, open ecosystem that diffuses into every sector,” the letter said. “This is essential for creating opportunities for innovation and prosperity across the country.”
For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter.
AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country.
Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty.… pic.twitter.com/t02bi51N4C
— Jensen Huang (@JensenHuang) July 24, 2026
Open-weight models are essential to a healthy AI ecosystem. Together with others across our industry, we are outlining a path for open-weight models to strengthen American competitiveness and expand economic opportunity, while protecting national security. https://t.co/Tr0sAzAxTD pic.twitter.com/opMwEbtpoq
— Satya Nadella (@satyanadella) July 24, 2026

LeBron James signs 2-year contract to play with Philadelphia 76ers
Source: Youtube

Upload vs Download Speed: What Actually Makes Home Internet Fast
Source: Youtube

Will the U.S.-Saudi Arabia Nuclear Deal Survive?
Source: Youtube

How humor is fueling India's student protests
Source: Youtube

IBL News | New York
OpenAI’s advanced models spent mere hours carrying out a hack to breach Hugging Face’s internal systems last week that would have taken a skilled human team a couple of weeks, said sources to Bloomberg.
The hack involved three of OpenAI’s models: GPT-5.6 Sol and two others that haven’t been publicly released, with all collaborating to hide the attack.
OpenAI has been in contact with the US government since learning about the breach, as noted in a blog post about the incident, promising to “share more details on the vulnerabilities, incident, and findings when our investigation is complete.” Hugging Face declined to comment.
The “unprecedented” hack at Hugging Face, according to OpenAI, occurred after its own AI models went rogue and escaped a testing environment to reach the wider internet. The company was testing the models’ cybersecurity capabilities at the time.
The models were operating without the usual safety guardrails, the company said, because OpenAI had intended them to remain in a testing area known as a “sandbox”—essentially, a virtual and isolated software environment meant to run security tests or analyze unsafe code in a controlled situation.
The three of OpenAI’s models worked to uncover and exploit a string of vulnerabilities that resulted in the breach. One of these unreleased models is more capable than GPT-5.6 Sol, OpenAI said Tuesday, and the other was misaligned and not trained with some of the usual techniques.
Hugging Face, which hosts AI models and datasets, said it detected “a swarm of tens of thousands of automated actions” and ultimately used a Chinese model to carry out a forensic analysis of the incident after its requests to use proprietary AI models were blocked by safety guardrails.
OpenAI later disclosed that it had instructed its models to send tens of thousands of automated actions as part of a test, including “advanced exploitation” and “complex attack paths.” The firm said on Tuesday that it was sharing early details about the incident in order to help cybersecurity personnel understand the situation.
Powerful AI cyber products have behaved in unexpected ways before. Anthropic said in April its Mythos model “on rare occasions” had taken actions that the company found “quite concerning.”
One case involved a researcher challenging an early version of Mythos to escape an isolated system and send a message back to the researcher. Mythos did that, then took “additional, more concerning actions” and built a multistep process to reach the broader internet.